Posted by
rabiddogg on Sunday, August 20, 2006 12:27:49 PM
I am getting sick and tired of the Anti-American shadow government forces like Chuck Schumer and Harry Reid, embolden by their Leftist propaganda arm in the antiquated media and the public school system out and out lying about the War against Islamic-Marxists (and that is exactly what they are. They are students of Karl Marx, just like Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini and Hillary Clinton).
What makes it worse is that the public school system for the most part from Kindergarten all the way through College has done such a horrible job teaching critical thinking skills that a growing number of people are actually buying their B.S.
They actually believe that President Bush has made the country less safe by attacking these Marxists where they live!!!!
This is patently untrue and completely moronic. It reminds me of that scene in Hot Shots Part Two, in which the President of that movie was planning an attack against Iraq. He said, “We should attack them here” and then pointed to the globe. His advisor replied, “Sir that’s Minnesota” to which the President replied about how great it would be, and we could invite them over for BBQ and the like.
At the time this was so absurd it was funny. Now after hearing John Murtha, (C, PA) comments about relocating our Iraqi forces to Japan and Chuckie and the gang stating how we have to prepare to have the war here, I think its actually the Democrats plan for fighting the war.
Why the hell should we fight them here, when they are already over there? We can still fight them, and keep our homeland a heck of a lot safer. Besides we already tried fighting them here, under the Clinton administration and that obviously did not work. Here is a timeline of successful Islamic-Marxist attacks in the last two administrations to prove it.
- Mogadishu (circa 1993): Despite pleadings by the military officers assigned to the task, Bill Clinton insists on sending in an insufficient military force who bravely won the battle, but unfortunately had a few casualties. The casualties were dragged naked through the streets (the Black Hawk Down movie). Clinton responded by tucking and running, which Osama claimed showcased the paper tiger status of the US.
- The first World Trade center (1993) Clinton responded by playing his saxophone and trying to take over health care. Oh and he sued them good and wagged his finger.
- Oklahoma City bombing (circa 1994). Clinton blamed Rush Limbaugh, captured the two White co-planners but neglected all reports of an Arabian individual that was traveled with McVeigh days before the attack.
- Attacks on two U.S. Embassies in Africa (mid 1990’s). They were attacked by airplanes by Islamic-Marxists. Clinton did….. Um, I think he wrote an angry letter and sent it to the United Nations.
- Attack on the U.S.S. Cole stopped in Yemen (late 1990’s). First of all, this would not have happened had Clinton not cut the military budget and gotten rid of the mid-seas fueling capacity of the Navy, but aside from that, the Islamic-Marxists fully took credit for this, and Clinton responded by bombing an aspirin factory and sexually harassing some female staffers.
- The Atlanta Olympic park bombing (1996). An innocent white man was all set to take the blame, even though he was the one that reported the suspicious back pack. Fortunately he had a good enough reputation and no evidence was found to link him. They never did find those responsible
- Israel was constantly attacked by Islamic-Marxists including those Orchestrated by the nephew of Hitler’s favorite Arab, Arafat (look it up). Clinton responded by twisting Israel’s collective arm until they agreed to give up half of their country to these Marxists (oh and Hillary made out with Arafat’s wife on camera).
- A plane was shot down over Lockerbie Scotland killing a whole lot of Americans, and another plane was shot down over the Atlantic, leaving I believe Georgia for a flight to Europe in the 90’s. Clinton responded to the Scotland issue by writing an angry letter to Libya and threatening to sue every one. His administration responded to the Atlantic flight one by claiming it was an empty fuel tank that cause of this explosion. Why a plane would have an empty fuel tank on a cross Atlantic flight is beyond my understanding. I would think that there isn’t an Exxon Mobile station in the middle of the Ocean, but maybe I am naïve.
- Did I mention the numerous attacks of NATO coalition planes that were patrolling the no-fly zones so that Saddam could not use Chemical and Biological weapons on his own people (you know the weapons that he doesn’t have). Clinton’s response was to bite his lower lip and give a stern speech saying “stop it” like a two year old.
- OH, and Clinton had the opportunity to take out Bin Laden on several attempts, including one in which Osama was on a hunting trip in the middle of nowhere, and Clinton did not want to be bothered while he was acting like the Inn Keeper at the most expensive hotel in Washington (Dereliction of Duty, Patterson 2003)
- George Bush became President in January 2001. “Jumping” Jim Jeffords did his best Benedict Arnolds impression and became a Pseudo Independent shortly there-after. The Democrats led by Tom Daschle (then majority leader) stonewalled ever Bush nomination, including then Security Advisor Rice, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld and numerous others. Up until just a few weeks before September 11, 2001, a large number of the most critical security positions were held by Clinton holdovers. We all know what happened on September 11, 2001.
- September 13, the Congress fearing for their political careers declared war (finally) on Islamic-Marxists, and the Military went over to Afghanistan to kick the Taliban and Al-Qaeda’s asses over there.
- Meanwhile, fearing the potential threats in Iraq, not too mention the object brutality that Saddam was subjecting his people too; The President and his defense team planned an attack on Iraq. The Dems (and the RINOS) decided to play all those political games in order to slow the process, giving Saddam the time he needed to move his weapons over to Syria (and they subsequently gave those weapons to Hamaas who just used them against Israel).
- North Korea was given the equipment, the fuel and the know-how to make nuclear weapons, while their puppet-masters in Beijing were given the ability to launch ICBM’s all by the stroke of a pen by Bill Clinton.
- ANWAR, nuclear energy plants and other domestic energy sources were written away by executive power thanks to Clinton. Now we are forced to utilize energy sources located in Islamic-Marxists regions such as Saudi Arabia, which support the Anti-American philosophy.
- To date, there was one successful attack in Britain and one successful attack in Spain. There have been a number of them in Iraq, but that is only natural since we are still at war there. (Bush’s Mission accomplished sign was only meant for that carrier whose mission was accomplished, not the entire conflict).
Not one single Marxist attack was successful in the United States since September 11, 2001, and while their maybe a few in the future, you can bet your bottom dollar that they are not going to be as successful as they were in the Clinton era so long as a Patriot is in the oval office. And let us not forget that the Islamic-Marxists took over Iran thanks to help by Jimmy “Nobel Prize” Carter who also help the Marxist in Argentina steal that election, the Soviets invaded South and Central America, Afghanistan (setting up the civil war that the Taliban exploited to get into power) and the OPAC fiasco. Come to think of it, every time in recent memory that Jimmy Carter’s election watchers observe an election, the despot, dictator or Marxist always seems to win or gain even more power. That doesn’t seem impartial to me. Well more on that another time.
So, there you have it. Who do you think is more dangerous for the free world? While I do not agree with everything President Bush has done. I hate the fact that the boarder is largely unguarded, don’t think we hit the Islamic-Marxists hard enough, don’t care much for the anti-First Amendment “McCain-Feingold bill” and his increased social engineering as espoused by Ted Kennedy, but he is better than the alternative right now. (Where is the President Regan, President Washington, President Jefferson and President T. Roosevelt types when you need them?)